Blizzard finally gives Hunters a tier set that is named appropriately, even awesomely, and yet manage to shower it with the most depressing set bonuses this side of T4 despite the overall greatness of the gear stats.
/cry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I know , what the hell
They keep Fraking us hunters over on our Tier set bonus.
That is so not right.
I suppose it allows you to reallocate Go for the Throat points?
5% more crit on Steady? Rather have mana back on attacks or something...
Like I said on Twitter, I don't want some stupid elf whore's name on my tier set.
Should've been Nesingwary's and Rexxar's.
Rexxar, maybe.
Nesignwary, never. If I could farm that dwarf in the game, I would.
However, I like the idea of having a Ranger's name on my gear. Even though it could go either Horde or Alliance for Windrunner, I hope they don't get lazy and just make it Windrunner for both when all the other classes have two names.
It IS Windrunner's for both.
Hence why I said: Nesingwary's for Alliance, Rexxar's for Horde.
Clearly looks like an attempt to bring BM hunters back into line with MM and Surv. While the DPS changes with the weapons favoured those 2 specs it had a lesser impact on BM as a larger percentage of their damage was from the pet. While these bonus arnt exactly fair it may even things up.
Can you believe how lame some of these set bonuses are? I hope they're working on the elemental shamans and the Death Knights. Those bonuses are just lame from what I see. Maybe they're better than I think in action, but on paper they look lame.
i support horde version being Rexxar 100%
I simply dislike the fact that Blizzard is being lazy in giving both Horde and Alliance the same set name. I know the Windrunners have sisters on both sides of the divide, but they were more Rangers than Hunters. Rexxar is better (at least he has a pet) - but Nesingwary is terrible. Him, with a pet?! He would sooner skin it alive.
Post a Comment